<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats, Republicans, Minor Parties, &amp; Independents All Agree: The Top Two Primary is a Bad Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freeandequal.org/2009/06/democrats-republicans-minor-parties-independents-all-agree-the-top-two-primary-is-a-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freeandequal.org/2009/06/democrats-republicans-minor-parties-independents-all-agree-the-top-two-primary-is-a-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>A Free and Equal Elections Foundation Project</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rankin</title>
		<link>http://www.freeandequal.org/2009/06/democrats-republicans-minor-parties-independents-all-agree-the-top-two-primary-is-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeandequal.org/?p=562#comment-471</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://southerncrown.blogspot.com/2005/09/should-mississippi-change-its-primary.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Louisiana and Mississippi&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://southerncrown.blogspot.com/2005/09/should-mississippi-change-its-primary.html" rel="nofollow">Louisiana and Mississippi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rankin</title>
		<link>http://www.freeandequal.org/2009/06/democrats-republicans-minor-parties-independents-all-agree-the-top-two-primary-is-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeandequal.org/?p=562#comment-469</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the article which details the history of Louisiana&#039;s &quot;top two&quot; as well as the efforts to impose such a system in Mississippi:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://southerncrown.blogspot.com/2005/09/should-mississippi-change-its-primary.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the article which details the history of Louisiana&#8217;s &#8220;top two&#8221; as well as the efforts to impose such a system in Mississippi:  <a href="http://southerncrown.blogspot.com/2005/09/should-mississippi-change-its-primary.html" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rankin</title>
		<link>http://www.freeandequal.org/2009/06/democrats-republicans-minor-parties-independents-all-agree-the-top-two-primary-is-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freeandequal.org/?p=562#comment-468</guid>
		<description>The following piece was written during the 2004 &quot;top two&quot; initiative campaigns in California and Washington state.  Washington voters approved the &quot;top two,&quot; and that state first used it in 2008.  Litigation is pending against the &quot;top two&quot; in U. S. district court there.

54% of California&#039;s voters said &quot;no&quot; to the &quot;top two,&quot; as it lost in 51 of the state&#039;s 58 counties.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://southerncrown.blogspot.com/2004/10/will-washington-and-california-cross.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;

The piece linked to below was written prior to Washington state&#039;s adoption of the &quot;top two.&quot;  It details the working of the Louisiana &quot;top two,&quot; which has existed since 1975.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://southerncrown.blogspot.com/2005/09/should-mississippi-change-its-primary.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following piece was written during the 2004 &#8220;top two&#8221; initiative campaigns in California and Washington state.  Washington voters approved the &#8220;top two,&#8221; and that state first used it in 2008.  Litigation is pending against the &#8220;top two&#8221; in U. S. district court there.</p>
<p>54% of California&#8217;s voters said &#8220;no&#8221; to the &#8220;top two,&#8221; as it lost in 51 of the state&#8217;s 58 counties.</p>
<p><a href="http://southerncrown.blogspot.com/2004/10/will-washington-and-california-cross.html" rel="nofollow"></p>
<p>The piece linked to below was written prior to Washington state&#8217;s adoption of the &#8220;top two.&#8221;  It details the working of the Louisiana &#8220;top two,&#8221; which has existed since 1975.</p>
<p></a><a href="http://southerncrown.blogspot.com/2005/09/should-mississippi-change-its-primary.html" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

